Skip to content

Analysis of LNG narratives in Dutch media

๐‹๐๐† ๐ข๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐ž. ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐š๐ซ๐ž ๐ฐ๐ž ๐ฅ๐จ๐จ๐ค๐ข๐ง๐  ๐œ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฌ๐ž๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ž๐ง๐จ๐ฎ๐ ๐ก ๐š๐ญ ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐œ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฆ๐š๐ญ๐ž ๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐ค๐ฌ?
Most people donโ€™t read scientific reports. They learn about climate solutions through the news. What the media choose to highlight, and what they donโ€™t, helps shape the public and political agenda.

We analysed how LNG has been covered in Dutch media since 1991. And we took a closer look at its use as a marine fuel.

What we found:
โžก๏ธ The environmental impact of LNG received remarkably little attention: ๐จ๐ง๐ฅ๐ฒ 14% ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐š๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐œ๐ฅ๐ž๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ž๐ ๐ž๐ง๐ฏ๐ข๐ซ๐จ๐ง๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐š๐ฅ ๐จ๐ซ ๐œ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฆ๐š๐ญ๐ž ๐š๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ฌ.

โžก๏ธ Of those articles, ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฆ๐ž ๐จ๐ง๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ž๐ง๐ฏ๐ข๐ซ๐จ๐ง๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐š๐ฅ ๐›๐ž๐ง๐ž๐Ÿ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐‹๐๐†, ๐๐ž๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ข๐ญ๐ž ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐ข๐ ๐ง๐ข๐Ÿ๐ข๐œ๐š๐ง๐ญ ๐œ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฆ๐š๐ญ๐ž ๐ข๐ฆ๐ฉ๐š๐œ๐ญ (though coverage has recently become more balanced and critical – graph 1). This is especially true for LNG as marine fuel: two-thirds of such articles contain only positive environmental narratives over the whole reporting period.

โžก๏ธ Framing of LNG (in all its applications) as a โ€œ๐ญ๐ซ๐š๐ง๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐Ÿ๐ฎ๐ž๐ฅโ€ to lower-carbon energy is still more prevalent than narratives around lock-in or the difficulty of repurposing LNG-infrastructure for renewables.

โžก๏ธ ๐€๐ง๐ ๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ๐ก๐š๐ฉ๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ข๐ค๐ข๐ง๐ : ๐š ๐ฌ๐ฆ๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ ๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ฉ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ž๐ฑ๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ๐ญ๐ฌ, some with ties to the fossil fuel industry, are dominant in the debate (graph 2)
> The three most cited experts appeared in over 250 news articles: far more than experts from environmental organisations.
> Expertise on economy, trade and markets is more frequently consulted compared to climate impact, community effects or fossil lock-in risks.
> Fossil-fuel affiliations are often not disclosed.

This creates a risk of a one-dimensional public debate on LNG.

Our research underscores the crucial role journalists and news media can play in covering the climate and energy transition: fact-checking claims, amplifying independent and critical voices, and bringing both impacts and alternatives into the conversation.


๐Ÿ‘‰ Research paper (pre-print), with a detailed explanation of the research method and outcomes

๐Ÿ‘‰Article by Bart Crezee on Momus (in Dutch)

๐Ÿ‘‰Recording of the public event with a journalist panel at Pakhuis de Zwijger (in Dutch)

๐Ÿ‘‰Interview with Aaron and Lynn by Pakhuis de Zwijger (in Dutch)

Research by Aaron Pereira, Lynn Vanheule & Chris Julien.